| Back to gregoryharms.com |

November 11, 2025

Leah the Auteur

 My friend Leah sent me this video she made today. She put a very lovely song over it, and I must say it had me almost emotional. Maybe it’s the song, maybe it’s my connection to Leah. But I found it meditative and sweet. I just wanted to share it.

Curious there’s a fence, because usually Leah is right in the mix with the animals. But there it is.

I hope you enjoy the video.

Blogger is not processing the video. See my Instagram profile.





November 5, 2025

My Friend Leah—an update

I mentioned my friend Leah in a recent post about my re-reading of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. She battles dissociative identity disorder (DID), more commonly known as “multiple personality disorder.” It’s the brain’s way of dealing with trauma and abuse at an early age, which Leah was treated to an abundance of as a girl.

I will not go into specifics, but what I have to tell would keep you up at night. Society jokes about being scarred for life. Leah is. Due to the trauma, her mind has fragmented and has become compartmentalized. One might say it became modular.

As mentioned, Leah is not her real name. As a matter of fact, she hates that name. But it’s the one that I selected, and she is stuck with it. She’s absolutely thrilled.

At any rate, she is currently in a residential mental-health facility. It’s quite nice, located in a secluded and scenic area. They have goats and pigs. I have seen them on FaceTime, and I kept urging Leah to go pet one of the pigs, but they were too far. Leah is well accustomed to me acting like a four-year-old.

We bicker endlessly. Like children. “You’re weird” “No, you’re weird!” “You are!” We recently got into one of our bickering matches, and Leah said, “Is this all we do??” To which I replied, “It’s about 80 percent of it.”

She has had a rough few weeks. Leah bottoms out. Think of the trough of a sine curve. When the emotions get too intense, she is prone to “switching.” This is when one of the parts or alters (personalities) comes to the front. I have talked to a number of these. How many? Hard to say. I would say maybe six. There are fifteen in total.

A few nights ago we were talking, and Leah looked off. I asked her if she was okay. The eyes are always a dead give-away. They go dull and start darting to and fro. She had switched.

I ended up having a rather lovely half-hour conversation with Bailee (not the alter’s name). She now knows her codename is Bailee, and she doesn’t much care for it. “That’s a weird name.” But there it is.

During our conversation, she asked some interesting questions. She said, “She [Leah] loves you.” I replied that I loved Leah as well. Then Bailee said, “But we’re kinda the same person, so what does that mean for me? I replied, “I love you both, of course.” “You love me?” “Yes, Bailee, I love you.” She smiled and said no one had ever said that to her before.

She began painting during our chat. I’ve been nudging Leah in that direction for a while now. Not necessarily “pushing” it, just encouraging it. I think she loves it—hard to say. She definitely enjoys buying art supplies, that’s for sure.

At first she was apprehensive. She didn’t want to fail—something she fears in general. I said, “It’s art. You’re 100 percent going to fail. You’ll paint one crap painting, then another, then another. You might paint fifty crap paintings, but on painting 51, you might be like, ‘Huh, that’s interesting.’ Then it begins.” But Leah is already conducting interesting experiments.

Her last painting, however, was … um, not great. We laughed hysterically. “Okay, it’s not your best work,” I said, trying to be supportive. But then I said, you’ve done two interesting things here. After pointing them out, I said, “Let’s commit those two ideas to memory.”

So, back to Bailee. She begins painting, and she says “Do you think we [Leah and I] can have different abilities?” I said, “Of course you can. However, you do paint like her.” She replied, “I think we both like red.” “Yes, it would seem so,” I said laughing.

Near the end of our conversation—we both desperately needed to get some sleep—Bailee asked me, “How come you don’t write about us anymore?” (I was impressed she knew and remembered.) I pointed out that I had only done the one essay—and a half-essay at that. She said, “Can you write about us some more?” I said that I would, hence this piece.

Bailee, this essay is for you. And thanks, Leah, for letting me post it. I love you and I believe in you—and that goes for Bailee, too. Of course.

November 3, 2025

Detectorists

A friend recommended this British comedy series. I found it endearing and charming. It's about two metal detector hobbyists, Lance and Andy (played by Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook),—they're called detectorists!—who are best friends. The series is calm, rather funny, and humane. It's really unlike any series I've seen.

There are also two rival detectorists—Lance and Andy's arch enemies, really—who happen to look like Simon and Garfunkle. When the four exchange words, which occurs frequently, one of our detectorists invariably cites a line from a Simon and Garfunkle song. Lance and Andy then always fist bump. I love this.

If you're looking for calm and charming and light, this is the series for you.

https://tubitv.com/series/300006335/detectorists



October 31, 2025

The Arrogance of Ignorance

Note: This is kind of a footnote I am putting at the beginning of my essay. It simply runs through the generations’ dates.

• Baby Boomers (born 1946–1964)

• Generation X (1965–1980)

• Millennials (1981–1996)

• Generation Z (1997–2012)

• Generation Alpha (2013–2025?)



Okay, this essay was inspired by Gen Z. My students know that I am not casually critical of their generation. I am not one of these self-congratulatory, self-indulgent, blowhard Gen Xers (or Boomers) who pat themselves on the back for riding their bikes without helmets when they were children. Wow, what an inspiration you are.

The Boomers also love to punch down at the Millennials and Gen Z for being fragile and wimpy; this is because the Boomers are—like my generation—impressed with themselves for being rugged and resilient.

Point of order: What two generations have brought the country to a low point? Why do we not have universal healthcare? Why is there a sociopathic circus clown in the White House? Why is the infrastructure falling down around our ears? Why is Wall Street signing us up for another 2008? Gen X and the Boomers, in all their rugged resilience, are responsible for the worst political cowardice and compliance maybe this country has ever seen.

So, to reiterate, I do not casually criticize Gen Z. I do in fact have a lot of experience with them. I spend five days a week in their company and have for years. I am familiar with their culture. And that said, I have noticed something that I cannot unsee.

Now, this behavior is not peculiar to Gen Z. It can be found in all generations. It’s prevalent in my generation, the Boomers seem to traffic in it, and the Millennials are not innocent of it.

Maybe it’s an American phenomenon; I’ll have to think on that a bit more. For now, I’m going to proceed like it is indeed an American phenomenon.

But like I said, it clicked first while observing Gen Z. I noticed that there lies a deep (and eerily quiet) arrogance in their culture. How did I arrive at this conclusion? Consider the following argument:

Premise 1: There exists among Gen Z culture (and others) the thinking that “If I don’t know it, it’s not important.”

Premise 2: The contrapositive of that conditional statement is “If it’s important, then I know it.” Contraposition is valid. (The contrapositive of a conditional statement is going from If P then Q, to If not Q then not P—valid.)

We proceed:

Premise 3: A person who knows all important things is intellectually complete.

Premise 4
: Anyone who is intellectually complete is perfect.

Conclusion: The person who holds this view operates from the assumption that they are perfect.

And there it is. The ignorance that prevails in the culture (American culture) betrays an almost pathological arrogance. I know people who are 18 who think this way; I know people who are 78 who think this way.

But I am most concerned about Gen Z. I like them. I want more and better for them. I am honest with them. I share analytical observations with them—critical ones—that they don’t necessarily want to hear. But what kind of intellectual would I be if I did not tell people what they don’t want to hear?

I don’t want to see Gen Z make this terrible mistake. I don’t want to see them act like Boomers. The way to go through life—if one wishes for a richer life—is to live with a sense of curiosity and wonder. One must live one’s life open to new information, new ways of thinking, and new experiences. For all their very good qualities, I just don’t see this in Gen Z. And it scares me.





October 24, 2025

Episode 17

Well, we finally got copyright scolded by YouTube. Not badly, just a note. At 5:36 in the episode, we had Jimi Hendrix's "Star-Spangled Banner" accompanying the text, which was originally posted up by some jamoke. So, I though we could use the audio at least. I was wrong. I then opted for YouTube to delete the audio, and they did a poor job. We therefore did a new version, where the text beginning at 5:36 is now accompanied by silence. I think this might be even better than the Hendrix. 

We lost our viewer count—39!—but at least now we're fully compliant.

Thought you should know.

October 19, 2025

Episode 17: Vietnam

• We did not go there as referees

• We did not get “sucked in”

• We did not go there with good intentions

We were not defending ourselves

• Vietnam did not invade or attack the United States

• The issue was not North Vietnam

• The issue was punishing South Vietnam

• We were not fighting communism

• Ho Chi Minh was not a communist

• The Viet Cong were defending their country

• Jane Fonda is tiresome, not a “traitor”

• The movies are, by subtraction, distortions—all of them

• The United States lost 58,000 service personnel

• Vietnam lost 2–3 million people

October 12, 2025

Harms Army

It's official.

Well, both those words are inaccurate There is no actual entity called the "Harms Army." And therefore "it" could not be official. However, we won't let that stop us. Take that, reality!



Blog Archive