| Back to gregoryharms.com |

December 16, 2025

Chomsky-Epstein Contoversy

I'll post this article for those following the story. The piece is long and the topic is quite specific.

Greg Grandin's article in the Nation is one of the few rational things I have read on this issue.

Sadly, due to a debilitating stroke, Chomsky is not able to defend himself. Many are saying "Aha, there's the proof!" This reaction is due to the fact that they don't like him. And the reason for them not liking him is that for many decades, Chomsky has applied standards universally, criticized US foreign policy first, described Israel's behavior accurately, and analyzed wealth, power, and the doctrinal system as one should.
 
But those who believe America wears the white hat, and believe Israel can do no wrong, are not receptive to cogent analysis. This will win you lots of enemies. And Chomsky haters are legion.

When the news broke, I was like "God damnit." (I knew what people would be saying.) It looks like Epstein wanted to ingratiate himself with brilliant academics. And he already had cultivated a relationship with MIT. It's mostly Epstein emailing Chomsky, and Chomsky responding. And Chomsky would talk to anyone. His open-door policy occasionally put him in contact with unsavory folk.

I do not believe this is a smoking gun. Chomsky was not jetting off to the island. His moral integrity was unique and nothing short of inspiring. He was a tireless voice for the vulnerable and voiceless.

A suggestion: Go on Amazon (or wherever), and randomly throw a dozen Chomsky books in your shopping cart. Then go on YouTube and randomly select fifty interviews and/or lectures and watch them. And then send me an email, and let me know what you think.



Blog Archive